(Note To Readers, Legislators, and Media: This article is meant to be a strictly factual article without judgement and opinion. As the alternative bills on property tax reform are introduced, I will provide similar summaries, then offer a compare/contrast of the bills. I am taking this approach because the biggest challenge the legislature will face is the arguments over which plan is better, rather than the details. This would cause the legislature to bog down. It is my intention to help legislators and the public determine what these proposals actually do and what provisions of each proposal make the most sense and offer the most bang for the buck to the taxpayers, within the context of the framework for property tax reform I have previously outlined. Previously, the explanation of Governor Armstrong’s plan was published and can be found here, the explanation of Representative Scott Louser’s plan can be found here, and the explanation Representative Ben Koppelman’s plan can be found here, and the explanation of Representative Nathan Toman’s plan can be found here.)
Senator Tim Mather introduced SB 2298, a broad-based homestead tax credit without age, income, or status restrictions, applicable to primary residences. The credit, up to $200,000 in true and full value, extends to trusts, corporations, and life estates. It maintains the existing rent refund provision and includes a taxable valuation reduction of up to $9,000. The bill aims to simplify property tax relief by eliminating specific credits and supports local control. Mather emphasized the need for the bill due to a 2024 ballot measure promising property tax reduction and highlighted its benefits for homeowners facing escalating taxes. The committee decided to consider the proposal further without immediate action.
Previously, I had posted Senator Mathern’s Guest Editorial on the bill (he is the first legislator to take up the offer to have an “in their own words” guest editorial on their property tax reform bill):
January 28, 2025
ND Senate Finance and Tax Committee
Chairman Weber and Committee Members,
My name is Tim Mathern, Senator from District 11. I am sponsor of this bill and a homeowner in Fargo with property tax of about $4000 per year. The median household income in my district is $61,000.
In general terms this bill is a broad-based homestead tax credit style program without any age, income, or status restrictions. The main qualifier is that the home serves as a person’s primary residence.
The amount of credit a person can receive is calculated the same way as the existing homestead tax credit, which provides an up to equivalent of $200,000 in true and full value.
· The credit stays the same for tax year 2024 but under the bill, trusts, corps, life estates and contracts for deed would also qualify. It solves the issue we had this past year with trusts not qualifying.
· Co-owners get a partial credit proportional to their ownership interest.
· There is an annual application process to receive the credit.
More Detailed Overview of SB 2298
· Section 8 of the bill creates a taxable valuation reduction for property used as a primary residence equal to one hundred percent of the taxable valuation of the individual's primary residence up to a maximum reduction of $9,000 of taxable valuation (equivalent to $200,000 in true and full value). This section contains numerous provisions related to the credit, including qualification criteria, definitions of various terms, including "primary residence", application requirements, and state reimbursement related provisions.
o Sections 6 and 7 relate to the expiration of the primary residence credit and the retroactive trust "fix". The credit language included in Section 6 would only be applicable to tax year 2024. Section 6 includes the language intended to fix the issue regarding primary residences held in trust for primary residence credits applicable only to tax year 2024 and a provision providing for retroactive application. The expiration date on this section is bumped out to December 31, 2026, to allow time for folks to utilize the retroactive application provision to access the credit for tax year 2024. After this date, the provision would expire. Beginning in tax year 2025, the new form of relief provided in Section 8 of the bill would be available to primary residence owners.
· The remainder of the provisions in the bill are the removal/repeal of the homestead property tax credit (Sections 57-02-08.1 and 57-02-08.2) and disabled veterans' credit (Section 57-02-08.8), to streamline the relief through the newly created taxable valuation reduction under Section 8 of the bill, including addressing the various cross references to those provisions throughout Century Code.
Why is this bill needed We had a ballot measure dealing with property tax in 2024. All of us told our constituents that we would do something to reduce their property tax bill. I think the measure was put on the ballot in part because homeowners didn’t realize how much property tax we already pay for with state revenues. This gives three reasons to pass this bill.
1. This bill eliminates some of programs and makes the property tax subsidy across the board for all homeowners. Every homeowner voter will experience what the state does to help them out!
2. This bill provides dramatic dollar amount of relief which is needed. Some people are beginning to lose their homes related to the escalating tax. Some retired folks are telling me their annual taxes are now more than what they paid for their home!
3. This bill supports local control. Local voters decide the amount and use of their property taxes.
We have the money and support to do this. I ask you for a Do Pass recommendation on SB2298.
Thank you.
Share this post